Note when working on these problems the model may be useful in figuring out why something works. However the proofs should be directly based on the axioms. It is legitimate to prove a statement using the model description if the model has been proven to be equivalent to the axioms. For this course proofs using the model will be worth fewer points than proofs directly from the axioms.
The smaller angle formed by a sensed parallel and a transversal through the given point is the angle of parallelism if and only if the transversal is perpendicular to the given line.
Consider the following illustrated in FigureΒ 5.3.8. \(\ell\) is the right sensed parallel to \(n\) at \(P.\) Let \(S\) be on \(\ell\) to the left of \(P.\) Suppose line \(m\) through \(S\) is the sensed parallel to \(n\) at \(S.\) Show that if \(T\) is on \(m\) to the left of \(S\) then \(m\) must be below \(\stackrel{\longleftrightarrow}{TP}\) to the right of \(T.\) Further if \(U\) on \(\ell\) such that \(U-S-P\) and \(A=\stackrel{\longleftrightarrow}{TP} \cap n\text{,}\) then sensed parallel \(m\) must be above \(\stackrel{\longleftrightarrow}{SA}\) to the right of \(A\) and above \(\stackrel{\longleftrightarrow}{UA}.\)
Consider the following illustrated in FigureΒ 5.3.10. \(\ell\) is the right sensed parallel to \(n\) at \(P.\) Let \(S\) be on \(\ell\) to the right of \(P.\) Suppose line \(m\) through \(S\) is the sensed parallel to \(n\) at \(S.\) Show that if \(U\) and \(T\) are on \(m\) such that \(U-S-T\) and \(A=\stackrel{\longleftrightarrow}{PT} \cap n\) then \(m\) is below \(\stackrel{\longleftrightarrow}{UA}\) to the right of \(U\) and above \(\stackrel{\longleftrightarrow}{PA}.\)
If \(\ell\) is the right sensed parallel to \(m\) at \(P,\) then \(\ell\) is the right sensed parallel to \(m\) at any point to the left of \(P\) on \(\ell.\)
If \(\ell\) is the sensed parallel to \(m\) at a point \(P\text{,}\) then \(\ell\) is the sensed parallel to \(m\) at any point \(Q\) also on \(\ell.\)
In terms of the model what are omega points (the third "vertex" of an omega triangle)? What might these represent in terms of pairs of sensed parallels?
Let \(\ell\) and \(m\) be sensed parallels. Let \(\overline{AB}\) be a transversal with \(A \in \ell\) and \(B \in m.\) Let \(M\) be the midpoint of \(\overline{AB},\) and \(D\) be the foot of the perpendicular from \(M\) to \(\ell.\) Also choose \(F \in m\) on the opposite side of \(\overline{AB}\) from \(D\) such that \(\overline{BF} \cong \overline{AD}.\) Let \(C \in \ell\) be such that \(C-A-D.\) Prove that \(\angle CAB \not\cong \angle AB\omega.\)